Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, we must note that it's also somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a little bit better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the OPPO Find X3 Lite, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Lite takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has higher video frame rate, a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a larger aperture. The Galaxy Note 20's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in OPPO Find X3 Lite.
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.