Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must note that it is also a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit smaller display and a bit less pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.