Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 81.2 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's design is just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a little lower pixel count in each inch of display, a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM and more CPU cores.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.