Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 79.3 against 74.1. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 5 design is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, even though it was released many years before.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit better display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 43 percent more battery size. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way more megapixels camera and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note 5 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.