Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is a little bit lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower display density, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition costs a bit more than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.