Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a overall score of 89 against 74.1. The Galaxy Note10 is a just a bit lighter phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy Note10 has a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite greater display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note10 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.