Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a overall score of 77.7 against 74.1. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, counting with some extra features. Although the Galaxy Note3 is notably older and a bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is still just a little lighter.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little better screen pixels density, a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.