Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 77.6 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a much older, a little thicker and just a little heavier device than OPPO Find X3 Lite. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a quite worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.