Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having an 80.2 score against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note5's construction is a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.