Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note7's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.