Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a global score of 83 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a way older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker phone than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a quite larger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much more mega pixels camera.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note8 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.