Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a score of 93.6 against 74.1. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give very similar operating system features. The Galaxy S10 5G is a heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but both are equally thin.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a little worse pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S10 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.