Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 86.3 score against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.