Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a overall score of 98 against 74.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller display, a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower display density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.