Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a just a little higher screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bigger display and way more brightness.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much storage capacity for games and applications as OPPO Find X3 Lite, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.