Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Galaxy S5 Sport is a older and thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although slower) and more RAM. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little higher display density.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot larger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels back facing camera. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 54% larger battery size.
Galaxy S5 Sport is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.