Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-14 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 80.9 score against 74.1. Galaxy S6 Active's design is noticeably lighter but thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has just a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a brighter screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixel quantity in each display inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.