Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. The Galaxy S7 design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density, a bit brighter display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way higher resolution camera.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.