Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 75.8 score against 74.1. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy S7 Active design is way older, noticeably thicker and just a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lot darker display and a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.