Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S7 edge has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, so it provides you some additional features. The Galaxy S7 edge body is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Lite, even though it was released 5 years before.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.