Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. The Galaxy S8 construction has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's just a bit lighter. The Galaxy S8 features a bit better display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Galaxy S8 features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.