Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 81.9 score against 74.1. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 Active design is incredibly older, somewhat heavier and way thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.