Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a score of 83.3 against 74.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is much older and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 features just a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S9 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit better processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.