Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even being the best we compare here, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker device than OPPO Find X3 Lite.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better number of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a processing unit that's very similar to the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, and although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as OPPO Find X3 Lite. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the OPPO Find X3 Lite, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.