Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it is also older, a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide you all the same OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much higher (4K) video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.