Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a global score of 88.5 against 74.1. The Galaxy Z Flip design is a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it's just a little heavier and was released just a bit further than a year before. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, so it provides the user some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a little worse pixel count in each inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip is way more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.