Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 560.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X3 Lite were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS, so they should give you identical operating system features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch.
OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.