Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 94.6 score against 74.1. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the OPPO Find X3 Lite were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is heavier but somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you very similar operating system features.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.