Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Although the Xperia XZs is notably older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger display. Sony Xperia XZs captures much better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower (4K) video definition.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Xperia XZs is more expensive than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.