Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. Despite of the fact the Xperia Z4v is extremely older and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a processing unit that's just as good as the CPU in OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although the Sony Xperia Z4v has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Xperia Z4v counts with a much better screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots clearer pictures and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xperia Z4v is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.