Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. TCL 20 Pro 5G is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it must be told that it is also somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so they should give identical OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
TCL 20 Pro 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with much more memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.