Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 90.1 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an older, noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite. These devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.