Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 88.3 score against 74.1. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, we must note that it is also somewhat heavier and extremely thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little lower pixels density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a bit bigger screen and much more brightness.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as OPPO Find X3 Lite, they have equal 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a little faster processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite. They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and a lot worse 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.