Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 81.4 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's design is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple additional features.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display, a quite brighter display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, a back camera with a much lower resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and OPPO Find X3 Lite both count with similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both have the same internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.