Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, having an 82.2 score against 74.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also an older, thicker and a bit heavier phone.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a really brighter display and a bit better pixel density.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite and the Xiaomi Mi 9T count with very similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a worse video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.