Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 82.7 score against 74.1. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even being the best we are comparing, it must be told that it's also older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way brighter screen, a bit more pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a tinier aperture. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and OPPO Find X3 Lite have similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.