Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 79.2 score against 74.1. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Although it's the best we compare here, Xiaomi Mi A3's body is older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a way better display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a little bit larger display, a better display density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Mi A3 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 features a camera that is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Lite's camera, although the Xiaomi Mi A3 has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller camera aperture and a camera with a way worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.