Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 77.5 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi Max 2's body is a little thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it is somewhat heavier and was released many years before. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite greater pixels quantity in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 128 GB. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 23% more battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a much larger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.