Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 83.8 score against 74.1. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier device than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little greater pixel density and a bit larger display. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 26% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a bit more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.