Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is older, way heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and less bright screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a quite greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with as much storage for games and applications as the OPPO Find X3 Lite, both have exactly the same internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.