Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a global score of 78.7, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's score of 74.1. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's construction is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has superior battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.