Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a score of 76.6 against 74.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. Even being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's body is older, heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a way better (4K) video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a back facing camera with much more MP. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.