Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a general score of 81.1 against 74.1. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is older, heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a quite better display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution back camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.