Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a general score of 79 against 74.1. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's design is older, heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with a way lower 48 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features superior battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.