Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11. HTC One M9's design is lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it is somewhat thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. HTC One M9 counts with a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% bigger battery size.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a lot more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.