Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a score of 77.6 against 76. HTC U11 is a just a bit lighter phone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but they are equally thin. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit worse pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen. OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
HTC U11 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.