Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. The LG Velvet design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's just a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit superior CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit higher display density. LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo and the LG Velvet both feature similar cameras, and although the LG Velvet has a worse video resolution and a lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size aperture. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.