Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 86.6 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but Samsung could make it a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A50s has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, a lower (4K) video quality and a worse 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.