Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 85.5 score against 76. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A51 is a a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but both have the same thickness.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a brighter screen than Galaxy A51. They have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a same size display and a better pixel count in each inch of screen. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A51 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A51 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a less megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller aperture.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.