Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a 90.8 score against 76. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give you all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A51 5G design is older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Neo.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better display than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a screen of the same size, the same screen pixel density and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G and OPPO Find X3 Neo count with extremely similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 48 mega pixels resolution, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video and a worse (4K) video definition.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.